Legal Opinion
Piombo v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1989No. A041794PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
The Board of Retirement of San Mateo County (the Board) appeals from an order granting a writ of mandate ordering it to permit respondent Frank Piombo to redeposit retirement contributions which he had made while a member of the retirement system of San Mateo County (the County) between 1954 and 1964 and had then-withdrawn, and to reinstate him in the system. Because at this point respondent is statutorily ineligible for redeposit and reinstatement, we must reverse.
I
Respondent was employed by the County as a deputy district attorney from January 1954 through August 1964,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- F & P Growers Ass'n v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hinchliffe v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lear v. Board of Retirement of San Diego County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- American Federation of State etc. Employees v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- American Federation of State etc. Employees v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013