Legal Opinion
Baggs v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 26, 2004No. A03A2080-A03A2082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
David Baggs, Javier Lopez, and Joel Mondragon were each convicted on one count of trafficking in methamphetamine.; In Case Nos. A03A2080 and A03A2081, Baggs and Lopez challenge the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to their individual convictions. In Case No. A03A2082, Mondragon raises eight enumerations of error, all of which are without merit. We affirm in all three cases.
**283 Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence reveals that a confidential informant introduced Baggs to an undercover police officer. Baggs informed the officer that he would…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Short v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Hash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Escobar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Nelloms v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005