Legal Opinion

Heitz v. Knox County Home Telephone Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1910No. 7,126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. Welborn, Judge. Action by Anton ITeitz and others against the Knox County Home Telephone Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

Appellants seek by this action to enforce a forfeiture of a lease of certain real estate in Knox county, Indiana. The cause was venued to the court below, where, upon issues formed, trial was had by the court resulting in a finding and judgment in favor of defendant.

The amended complaint originally consisted of two paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the first paragraph, after which, by leave of the court, a third paragraph was filed. Appellee answered by general denial and six amended paragraphs of affirmative answer. A demurrer to each of said affirmative answers was overruled, as was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cooper v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Gilliland v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Miller v. BottenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rembold Motors, Inc. v. BonfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hill v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API