Legal Opinion

Kuenne v. Kuenne

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 17, 1959No. [No. 118, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornEy, J.

Lillian Kuenne (Lillian or the caveator) and Raymond Emil Kuenne (Raymond or the caveatee) are brother and sister. When their mother, Bertha Kuenne (the mother or testatrix), died in 1956, she devised and bequeathed the bulk of her estate to Raymond. Lillian was not satisfied with the pittance she received and caveated the will. At the conclusion of the trial, the lower court directed the jury to answer the issues relating to undue influence and fraud in the negative, which had the effect of sustaining the will on those issues. The caveator appealed contending the court erred when it refused…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffith v. DiffenderfferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Townshend v. TownshendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  3. Waters v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  4. Jones v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Donnelly v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bauman v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Hughes v. AverzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Arbogast, Exec. v. MacMillanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. INGALLS, OF ESTATE OF INGALLS v. Trustees of Mt. Oak Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Hill v. LewisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API