Legal Opinion
Bulman v. Crist
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1991No. 36-3_18UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
940 F.2d 667
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Roland Wayne BULMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Roger CRIST, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-16780.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 23, 1991.*
Decided July 26, 1991.
Before PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Duckworth v. SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dennis Lee Cartwright v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Darryl Bernard Watts v. Bill Bonneville, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by13 opinions
- S.R. Nehad v. Neal BrowderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Pan Pac. Trading Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Vasquez v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Simpson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- CHERVENY v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.