Legal Opinion

CHERVENY v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided June 26, 2001No. 7621-99SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CLARENCE MICHAEL CHERVENY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

CHERVENY v. COMMISSIONER

No. 7621-99S

United States Tax Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-95; 2001 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 201;

June 26, 2001, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Clarence Michael Cherveny, pro se.

Michael O'Donnell, for respondent.

Pajak, John J.

Pajak, John J.

PAJAK, SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Clair S. Huffman v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Sher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Leopold Z. Sher and Karen B. Sher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. De Venney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API