Legal Opinion
Studebaker Corporation v. Nail
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 16, 1950No. 33198PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
The face of the instrument relied upon by plaintiff is as follows:
“Dealer Service Policy For Studebaker Owners.
“Preparation.
“This motor vehicle has been properly prepared before delivery to the owner, in accordance with standard factory instructions.
“Parts and Labor.
“For ninety days after delivery to the original purchaser, provided the vehicle has not been driven to exceed 4,000 miles, any parts (including all original equipment except tires) which are replaced under the terms of the Standard Factory Warranty will be installed by any authorized Studebaker dealer in the United States or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Refrigerator & Butchers Supply Co. v. ParmaleeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Burkhalter v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Brandon & Co. v. Franklin & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by73 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Lester v. S. J. Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.