Bledsoe v. State

on appellant’s motion for rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant insists that we erred in holding the facts sufficient to sustain the conviction and against his contention that there was a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the proof as to the property alleged to have been taken in the robbery.

This contention is presented for the first time in this court. No specific attack was made touching the alleged variance upon the trial of the case. Indeed, the'appellant did not specifically raise the question in his motion for new trial. Such,…