State v. Beckley
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case, the State of Alaska petitions for review of an order of the trial court granting Beckley’s motion to suppress the admission into evidence of narcotic drugs on the grounds that the drugs had been illegally seized under an invalid search warrant. Her motion to dismiss the indictment based on the presentation of the allegedly illegally seized evidence before the grand jury was also granted.
Because the orders from which the petition was taken affected a substantial right in the action which, in effect, terminates the proceeding and discontinues the action, and for the reason…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. DavenportAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Harrelson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Trunnel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975