Legal Opinion

Pedraza v. Pope

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 16, 2015No. CR-15-161Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2015 Ark. 172

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-161 DANIEL PEDRAZA Opinion Delivered April 16, 2015 PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. MANDAMUS [DREW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT NO. 22CR-12-37] HONORABLE SAM POPE, JUDGE RESPONDENT PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Petitioner Daniel Pedraza filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this court in which he alleges that the Honorable Sam Pope, Circuit Judge, has failed to timely provide a ruling on a pro se petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2014) that petitioner filed in the Drew County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eason v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Pedraza v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Urquhart v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Mason v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Ladwig v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API