Pedraza v. Pope
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2015 Ark. 172
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-161 DANIEL PEDRAZA Opinion Delivered April 16, 2015 PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. MANDAMUS [DREW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT NO. 22CR-12-37] HONORABLE SAM POPE, JUDGE RESPONDENT PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Petitioner Daniel Pedraza filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this court in which he alleges that the Honorable Sam Pope, Circuit Judge, has failed to timely provide a ruling on a pro se petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2014) that petitioner filed in the Drew County…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eason v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Pedraza v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Urquhart v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Mason v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Ladwig v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000