Legal Opinion

Eason v. Erwin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1989No. 89-280PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Circuit Judge Harold S. Erwin to act on certain pending motions and set a case for trial. They are residents of Poinsett County, Arkansas, and have sued Kaneaster Hodges, a Newport attorney, in Jackson County Circuit Court on a promissory note alleging that Hodges owes them approximately $145,000. The suit was filed December 27, 1988.

The petitioners filed a motion for summary judgment on February 3,1989, and according to their petition, the respondent instructed the parties to submit briefs within ten days, which was done. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rolfe v. Spybuck Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. State v. Board of Directors of School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Calandro v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Saunders v. NeuseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Hicks v. GravettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. RODERICK R. WILLIAMS v. HONORABLE STEVEN PORCHSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API