Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
This is an action of contract or tort for reimbursement to the amount of an abatement on a real estate" tax which had been paid by the plaintiff bank. The defendant city refused to pay the abatement in full, asserting a right to withhold the amount of unpaid taxes on another parcel of real estate. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 59, § 69, as amended by St. 1939, c. 366, § 3; G. L. (Ter. Ed.) *184c. 60, § 98. The case was heard upon a case stated by a judge, who “found” for the bank in the lesser amount admittedly due. This was in effect an order for judgment. Edinburg v. Alien-Squire Co. 299 Mass. 206,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Richardson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Dunham v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Burr v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Edinburg v. Allen-Squire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Boston v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Del Grosso v. Board of Appeal of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Town of Pepperell v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Decota v. StoughtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Town of Dedham v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.