Legal Opinion

Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 17, 2007No. 344,2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

This is the second appeal in a derivative action that has yet to be considered on its merits. In the first appeal, this Court reversed the trial court’s determination that appellants’ breach of fiduciary duty claims were subject to arbitration in Sweden. During the four years thereafter, appellants failed to initiate the damages phase of the Swedish arbitration. Because the trial court had entered a stay of the Delaware action, there was no substantive progress on those claims, either. In the end, the complaint was dismissed because appellants’ counsel had been permitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  2. Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Meyers v. Quiz-Dia LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
  4. Romeo v. DMG Practice Management Solutions, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API