Legal Opinion
Town of Deering Ex Rel. Bittenbender v. Tibbetts
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 17, 1964No. 5242PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The agreed statement of facts establishes that the structure which the defendant Tibbetts proposes to erect will be situated within one-fourth mile of Deering common and “is in violation of the ordinance as adopted ... in that approval of the selectmen has not been obtained.” Proper procedures were followed in the adoption of the ordinance and in mid-August 1963 the defendant’s application for permission to erect a “prebuilt home” on the lot in question (see Manchester v. Phillips, 343 Mass. 591, 595) was denied by the selectmen “on the grounds that the nature and design of the building . . .…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Town of Marblehead v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Town of Manchester v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Town of Lexington v. GovenarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Paula-Beth Lashley Maher, Administratrix of the Succession of Morris G. Maher v. The City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Beck v. Town of RaymondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Lafayette Park Baptist Church v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.