Yates v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiff James B. Yates maintains he was wrongfully discharged by defendant Philip Morris, Inc. as a result of his race and national origin. Plaintiff sues under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., (1982), and under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981.
Philip Morris now moves to dismiss plaintiff’s § 1981 claim on grounds of collateral estoppel, claiming that that cause of action was finally determined by a finding of “No Probable Cause” issued by the New York State Division of Human…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony J. Decintio v. Westchester County Medical Center County of Westchester, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Theodore KIRKLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Silver v. Mohasco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.