Legal Opinion

Yates v. Philip Morris Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 23, 1988No. 85 Civ. 3402 (CSH)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Plaintiff James B. Yates maintains he was wrongfully discharged by defendant Philip Morris, Inc. as a result of his race and national origin. Plaintiff sues under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., (1982), and under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Philip Morris now moves to dismiss plaintiff’s § 1981 claim on grounds of collateral estoppel, claiming that that cause of action was finally determined by a finding of “No Probable Cause” issued by the New York State Division of Human…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Anthony J. Decintio v. Westchester County Medical Center County of Westchester, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Theodore KIRKLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BUFFALO BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Silver v. Mohasco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API