Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nichols Corp. v. Bill Stuckman Construction, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1986No. 15656Published

1DissentWalters, Justice

(dissenting); SOSA, Senior Justice (concurring in dissent).

I dissent from the majority’s opinion because the record does not support the trial court’s submission of the partnership issue to the jury. See, NMSA 1978, Civ.P.R. 50 (Repl.Pamp.1980); Owen v. Burn Construction Co., 90 N.M. 297, 563 P.2d 91 (1977); State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Price, 101 N.M. 438, 684 P.2d 524 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 362, 683 P.2d 44 (1984). I am persuaded by Stuckman’s basic contention that had proper instructions been given, no reasonable jury could have concluded under the evidence presented in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Price Ex Rel. MoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Owen v. Burn Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cooper v. CurryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Fullerton v. KauneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dotson v. GriceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API