Dickey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff seeks to recover on a bond given under section 661 of the code of civil procedure (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 7569), for material furnished to defendant James A. Pringle, who, under contract, built a sewer for the city of Topeka. Action was commenced to recover $3,118.48, of which $2,161.47 was afterward paid. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff in favor of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company for $957.01 with interest thereon. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment against it and in favor of the United States…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Weber Implement & Automobile Co. v. DubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Citizens First National Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- OTTAWA PLUMBING, HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Ottawa Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.