Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Pearson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 2004No. 1-02-2432PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiff Jeffrey Alexander appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Plaintiff’s appointed counsel on appeal, the State Appellate Defender (SAD), contends that (1) this court should allow the SAD to withdraw as counsel and dismiss this appeal because the SAD is not authorized to represent a petitioner appealing the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition; and (2) in the interest of judicial economy, this court should dismiss the appeal because the substantive issue raised by plaintiffs appeal has been resolved by this court in another appeal by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. People v. De La PazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Maloney v. BowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. UrdialesIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Burnette v. StrogerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. KnappAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. People v. BuchananAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. People v. UrdialesIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API