Legal Opinion

People v. De La Paz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2003No. 93208PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Petitioner, Paul De La Paz, is currently serving an extended-term sentence for an armed robbery conviction. He has exhausted his direct appeals and is now before this court on appeal from the dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in the postconviction proceedings and also argues that his extended-term sentence should be reversed because the procedures followed by the circuit court did not comply with the Supreme Court’s mandate in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). We…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. SuarezIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. O'Casek v. Children's Home & Aid SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API