Lorenzo v. Kahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Peradotto, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I respectfully dissent in part because, in my view, Supreme Court erred in denying those parts of the motion of defendants Kenneth R. Kahn, M.D. and University Gynecologists & Obstetricians, Inc. (collectively, UGO defendants) seeking summary judgment dismissing the informed consent causes of action against them insofar as those causes of action, as amplified by the bill of particulars, are premised upon the performance of an episiotomy.
The UGO defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dries v. GregorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Bengston v. WangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ericson v. PalleschiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lucenti v. St. Elizabeth HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001