Legal Opinion

Annuity Transfers, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 18, 2009No. 08-386 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs seek a declaration from the court approving a structured settlement factoring transaction concerning an annuity purchased and owned by the United States. Defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ complaint and seeks dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In the alternative, defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56, contending that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Molina Healthcare of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API