Legal Opinion

Lustig v. Hutchinson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1953No. Gen. No. 45,757PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Feinberg

Plaintiff sued defendants Hutchinson and Cuneo for a brokerage commission for procuring a purchaser, ready, able and willing to buy upon the terms of sale submitted to plaintiff. A trial without a jury resulted in a finding and judgment in favor of Cuneo and a finding and judgment for plaintiff, against defendant Hutchinson, from which he appeals.

The complaint alleged that Cuneo owned the property in question; that on November 10, 1945, Hutchinson represented to plaintiff that he was exclusive broker for Cuneo and warranted to plaintiff that Cuneo authorized Hutchinson to employ plaintiff to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wagner v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Smith v. RutledgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API