Jesse L. Rose v. State of Indiana

May, Judge.

[1] Jesse L. Rose, pro se , appeals the post-conviction court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues the post-conviction court did not hold a procedurally fair hearing and did not enter adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] In 2012, Rose was convicted of four counts of Class A felony child molest. We affirmed that conviction in a memorandum opinion. See *264 Rose v. State , 09A05-1205-CR-251, 984 N.E.2d 256 (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2013), trans. denied.

[3] On April 30, 2014, Rose filed a petition for…