Clifton Power Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Chief Judge:
Clifton Power Corporation petitions for review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $15,000. Because the petition is incurably premature, we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.
I. Background
Clifton operates a hydroelectric power project on the Pacolet River in South Carolina. In 1991 the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Penalty against Clifton for failing to install stream-flow monitoring equipment as required by a condition of Clifton’s license. See…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Council Tree Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Allegheny Defense Project v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.