Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Murdoch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 2008No. 08-265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rc a obert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellant Josh Sanford, an a ^attorney with the Sanford Law Firm, PLLC, of Rus-

sellville, appeals from an order of the circuit court, ordering him to pay $2,492.11 in attomey-ad-litem fees to Timothy W. Murdoch, an attomey-ad-litem appointed for Marilyn Martin, who was Sanford’s former client. We affirm the circuit court’s order.

Since 2004, Sanford had represented and advised Martin in a variety of legal matters, including the planning of her estate. As such, documents relevant to her financial and estate planning were in Sanford’s possession. Included in these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seymour v. BiehslichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Kinchen v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Bullock v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Chiodini v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Hendrix v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Osborn v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Long v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API