Sanford v. Murdoch
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rc a obert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Josh Sanford, an a ^attorney with the Sanford Law Firm, PLLC, of Rus-
sellville, appeals from an order of the circuit court, ordering him to pay $2,492.11 in attomey-ad-litem fees to Timothy W. Murdoch, an attomey-ad-litem appointed for Marilyn Martin, who was Sanford’s former client. We affirm the circuit court’s order.
Since 2004, Sanford had represented and advised Martin in a variety of legal matters, including the planning of her estate. As such, documents relevant to her financial and estate planning were in Sanford’s possession. Included in these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seymour v. BiehslichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Kinchen v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Bullock v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Chiodini v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Hendrix v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Osborn v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Long v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.