Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District Council

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 8, 2008No. 2005-328-AppealPublished

1DissentJustice Flaherty

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding in this case. Although I agree with the majority that the no-restructuring clause that is contained in the 2002 revision to the collective-bargaining agreement sunsetted by its owns terms on June 30, 2005, the remainder of the collective-bar*537gaining agreement did not. Indeed, Article XXIII, section 1, of the original collective-bargaining agreement that the parties modified, the mayor signed, and the council ratified, provides that:

“The provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004, and shall…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API