Sears v. Munson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jackson District Court. In equity. — This cause, on a former appeal, was before tbis court, and its decision reported in 12 Iowa, 172. For tbe general nature of tbe controversy, reference is made to tbe statement and opinion there given. Tbe date of tbe contract between tbe parties is misprinted.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson District Court. In equity. — This cause, on a former appeal, was before tbis court, and its decision reported in 12 Iowa, 172. For tbe general nature of tbe controversy, reference is made to tbe statement and opinion there given. Tbe date of tbe contract between tbe parties is misprinted. It should be November 13, 181-7, instead of November, 13, 1857. ' In setting out a copy of the contract tbe words “ by their- (Munsons’) consent,” are omitted, as they occur in connection with tbe clause in reference to improvements to be'made. Tbe original contract reads thus : “ Tbe…
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
i. case approved. A majority of the court is of the opinion, that the former decision in this case (reported in 12 Iowa, 172) concludes the parties on the question of partnership and as to the rights of the parties, so far as then before the court, respecting the Munson farm. Concerning the question of partnership, we do not see how its determination, one way or the other, would eifect any material change in the result. It is more speculative than practical, and no injustice is done to the parties, or any of them, by the former opinion. Concerning the question as respects the Munson farm, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Levi v. KarrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Munson v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maynard v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Shelangowski v. SchrackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Morris v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Benbow v. BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Pearce v. StricklerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1898