Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Coquillard Wagon Works' Assignees
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 16, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Lassing —
Reversing.
*531The assignees of The Coquillard Wagon Works, at Henderson, Kentucky, instituted a suit against the Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company, in which they sought to recover $342, alleged to be due said company as a rebate on shipments made over said road from Big Hatchie, Tennessee, to Henderson. The company answered in two paragraphs. The first is a traverse. The second pleaded that the shipments of the timber in the rough, that is, the logs, to the company, and the shipment of the manufactured product by the company to various points in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hancock v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ches. & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Maysville Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BundickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adams Express Co. v. Burr Oak Jersey FarmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- American National Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Edenton Cotton Mills v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Boston v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.