Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1892No. 325, 326PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEALS • PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer

These two cases were argued together, the object of attack in each being the same, to wit, a lease, made by the 'Shelby Railroad Company, on July 16, 1879, to the Louisville, Cincinnati and Lexington Railway Company, and subsequently transferred by the latter to the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company. Each seeks the same relief, the cancellation of that lease. Hancock, the appellant in one case, was a stockholder in the Shelby Railroad Company, the appellant in the other, and. sues for the benefit of that company, the allegations of his bill being intended to bring the case within the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kreiger v. Shelby RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Gross v. Kentucky Board of ManagersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  3. California Toll Bridge Authority v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Rosencranz v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Harrison v. Wyoming Liquor CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API