Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 11, 2005No. 03-4234PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

All crack is cocaine base but not all cocaine base is crack. This case presents the question of whether this distinction is meaningful for purposes of the enhanced penalties for cocaine base offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b). The statute prescribes a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years for the manufacture, distribution, or possession with intent to manufacture or distribute 50 grams or more of “cocaine base.” 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). The federal Sentencing Guidelines also call for increased penalties, in the form of heightened base offense levels, for crimes…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. LiddellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Clarence Hankton and Gregory Davis, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. SaddlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API