Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Hanna

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1916No. 12850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered November 7, 1914, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

Action for breach of contract. Appeal from a judgment of dismissal upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint recited that, prior to January 25, 1909, Ryan and the defendant Hanna entered into an agreement, whereby Hanna employed Ryan as architect for a building which she contemplated constructing in Seattle; that, in accordance with the agreement, plans were prepared and other services performed by Ryan of the value of $1,800; that, in procuring these services, Hanna and the Sampson Investment Company acted jointly; in fact, the Sampson Investment Company is Hanna…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noyes v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Weldon v. DeganWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stice v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Newton Oil Co. v. BockholdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Chinook Lumber, & Shingle Co. v. McLane Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API