Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"[T]he law is clear that the indelible and nonwaivable right to counsel arises only after an accusatory instrument has been filed, as this is the means by which a criminal action is formally commenced” (People v Horn, 161 AD2d 603, 604; see, CPL 1.20 [1], [8], [17]; People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218). Moreover, it is the filing and not the filling out of the felony complaint which commences the prosecution for purposes of the attachment of *710the defendant’s right to counsel (see, People v Lane, 64 NY2d 1047). Here, the defendant was not denied his right to counsel and the statements he made to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. HornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. StrotherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. C.R. & D.W.New York Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API