Legal Opinion

Smith v. Oscar H. Will & Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

Bronson, Ch. J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of a con tract for the sale of certain seed. Defendánt has appealed from the judgment entered upon a verdict returned in plaintiff’s favor. The facts are :• — Plaintiff operated a farm near Pollock, South Dakota. Defendant conducted a seed house at Bismarck, North Dakota. In April, 1920, plaintiff, while in Bisniarck, visited defendant’s establishment. He inquired about Grimm alfalfa seed with which he was familiar. Defendant showed him a sample of Grimm alfalfa seed. Defendant also urged him to try Turkestan alfalfa…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pyle v. Eastern Seed Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Rocky Mountain Seed Co. v. KnorrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Phelps v. Grand Rapids Growers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Miller v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API