Legal Opinion

Miller v. Klindworth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1959No. 7762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Judge.

This is an action for damages alleged to have resulted from a sale of mislabeled seed wheat. In their complaint the plaintiffs alleged that they entered into a written contract with the defendants for the purchase of 200 bushels of Selkirk seed wheat; that pursuant to such contract the defendants delivered to them 200 bushels of wheat in sacks which were labeled “Selkirk”; that Selkirk wheat is a rust resistant variety of wheat; that plaintiffs planted the seed according to the best agricultural practices ; that the growing crop became highly infested with rust, and as a result…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Pyle v. Eastern Seed Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Leonard Seed Co. v. Crary Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Corneli Seed Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Ward v. ValkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. v. Dakota Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API