Legal Opinion

Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. Monte Christi Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 37 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel plaintiff to answer certain questions which he refused to answer during pre-trial examination and to overrule plaintiff’s objections to certain lines of inquiry on pre-trial examination. Defendant also moves for the production by plaintiff of all its books and records relating to its inventory of Swiss Ventura braid purchased from Jacques Mayer in Switzerland in 1945 during the period following February 1945, and its records showing the processing, sales or other disposition of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Sagorsky v. MalyonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. American Oil Co. v. Pennsylvania Petroleum Products Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  3. Triangle Mfg. Co. v. Paramount Bag Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  4. Russ Stonier, Inc. v. Droz Wood Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Reed v. Smith, Barney & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API