Johnson v. Amerson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Henry B. Johnson, plaintiff in the action below, complains of rul*76ings made in the trial court pertaining to uninsured motorist coverage and certain charges given during the trial of the case.
1. Appellant is dissatisfied because Commercial Union Insurance Company, the uninsured motorist carrier, was permitted to be included as a party to the action.
OCGA § 33-7-11 (d) which sets forth requirements for filing an action where an uninsured motorist is involved, provides in part: “In the case of a known owner or operator of such vehicle, either or both of whom is named as a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Moss v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Smith v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Big Bend Agri-Services, Inc. v. Bank of MeigsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Talley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Whelchel v. Thomas Ford Tractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Keenan v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Malloy v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.