Consolidated Coppermines Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiff sues for additional interest on a refund made it for an overpayment of taxes for 1941. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue refused to pay the interest claimed because he said that, in order to be entitled to the refund, it was necessary to carry back to the year 1941 a part of the 1943 excess profits credit, and that interest on a refund resulting from a carry-back of an excess profits credit is payable only from the date the claim for refund is filed, and, hence, plaintiff is not entitled to the additional interest claimed.
*733Plaintiff says, if the Commissioner of Internal Revenue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- St. Joseph Lead Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Armstrong Rubber Co.United States Court of Claims · 1975
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Sierra Pacific Resources & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.