Legal Opinion

Triplett v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1964No. 5-3430PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prank Holt, Associate Justice.

This litigation results from the forfeiture of a land contract. The Chancellor’s decree required the appellant to convey the lands in question to the appellee, Martha McCoy. On appeal the question presented is whether the appellant waived his right to enforce the forfeiture provision in the contract.

In 1954 appellee, Martha McCoy, and her husband entered into a “Rental Contract and Option to Purchase” eighty acres from the appellant. Later appellee McCoy acquired her husband’s interest. The contract was for a period of fifteen years providing for an annual rental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friar v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. White v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Williams v. ShaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Berry v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Vernon v. McEntireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fritts v. Cloud Oak Flooring CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Harvison v. Charles E. Davis & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Bright v. GassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Smith v. MRCC PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Humke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API