Legal Opinion
Millman v. Paige
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 12, 1999No. AC 18374PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether an action “in the nature of a bill of interpleader” brought pursuant to General Statutes § 52-4841 by a person claiming an interest in money in the possession of another person who also claims an interest in the proceeds should be dismissed. The trial court denied a motion to dismiss filed by the named defendant, Sheri *240Paige, an attorney and the interested possessor of the property, and rendered an interlocutory judgment of inteipleader for the plaintiff from which Paige has appealed.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Paige is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loda v. H. K. Sargeant & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Union Trust Co. v. Stamford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Crozier v. ZabooriConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Century Indemnity Co. v. KofskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Kerite Co. v. Alpha Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tracy v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Vincent Metro, LLC v. Yah Realty, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BurnakaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Collard & Roe, P.C. v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Director, Ret. Ben. Serv. Div. v. Foic, No. Cv 98 0492692 (Nov. 9, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.