Atkins v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Kenneth Atkins appeals his conviction for sexual battery and claims that the court erred in admitting a taped telephone conversation between the victim and her Mend, as admission of the conversation violated the wiretap statute, sections 934.03-934.09, Florida Statutes. Because the conversation was not taped for the purpose of obtaining evidence of a criminal act, it was improperly admitted. We reverse.
Atkins was charged with sexual battery by multiple perpetrators. The incident occurred at a party where A.S., the victim, was present. Her Mend, Jamie Doctor, was also present and introduced…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manborde v. SuarezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. WILLIAM GRAHAM MARCELLUS HAYES, IIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018