Legal Opinion

Atkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 2006No. 4D04-4379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Kenneth Atkins appeals his conviction for sexual battery and claims that the court erred in admitting a taped telephone conversation between the victim and her Mend, as admission of the conversation violated the wiretap statute, sections 934.03-934.09, Florida Statutes. Because the conversation was not taped for the purpose of obtaining evidence of a criminal act, it was improperly admitted. We reverse.

Atkins was charged with sexual battery by multiple perpetrators. The incident occurred at a party where A.S., the victim, was present. Her Mend, Jamie Doctor, was also present and introduced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manborde v. SuarezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  2. STATE OF FLORIDA v. WILLIAM GRAHAM MARCELLUS HAYES, IIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API