Smith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentHarris, J.
While I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in admitting the recorded telephone call between the Mother and Smith, I cannot agree that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. I dissent.
Our supreme court has held that the exclusionary rule in section 934.06, Florida Statutes (2016), is statutorily mandated. State v. Garcia, 547 So.2d 628, 630 (Fla. 1989) ("Chapter 934 ... unequivocally expresses the Legislature's desire to suppress evidence obtained in violation of that chapter."). Because it is a statutory mandate, the Court held that exceptions such as good faith do…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Ventura v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.