Legal Opinion

Newman v. City of Marceline

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc References: Appeal and Error, section 2974, p. 991, n. 33; Nuisances, 46CJ, section 312, p. 733, n. 53, 56; section 456, p. 807, n. 68; section 470, p. 813, n. 7. Action to recover damages for the maintenance of a temporary nuisance. The cause originated in the circuit court of Linn county, but went on change of venue to the circuit court of Carroll county where a trial was had which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appealed. Plaintiff was the owner of and resided in a residence property located in defendant city. The petition alleges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodyear v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  2. Givens v. Van StuddifordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Clark v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Edmondson v. City of MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. McCracken v. Swift & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klaber v. LakenanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Hog Haven Farms v. PearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Hillhouse v. City of AuroraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Bollinger v. American Asphalt Roof Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API