Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Walter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1876PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to St. Joseph Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J:

Plaintiffs in error, claiming to be Iona fide holders of a negotiable promissory note executed by the defendant, brought an action of assumpsit to recover the amount, thereof. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and filed therewith an affidavit, setting forth that the signature to the note declared upon he believed to be his, but that the same was procured under circumstances, fully set forth, which would render him not liable thereon.

■Upon the trial, after plaintiffs had introduced evidence tending to show that they were Iona fide holders, which was not disputed, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Gibbs v. LinaburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bissell v. StarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Horvath v. National Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. First National Bank of Parkersburg v. JohnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Soper v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Altschuler v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API