Stokes v. Stokes
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLeslie, J.
This is a suit by the plaintiffs against the defendants for damages alleged to have been occasioned them by a fraud perpetrated upon them, in that said defendants overreached them by means of an artifice or trick employed to induce them to sell certain lands at a price far below its value. The defendants answered separately by general denial, special defenses, and some of them presented cross-actions. The trial was before the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered denying plaintiffs recovery and removing cloud (plaintiffs’ claim) from title to the land in response to a cross-action of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Hetland v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Mudsill Min. Co. v. WatrousCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Adams v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Hoyt v. First Nat. Bank of ChesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014