Legal Opinion

Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 27, 2014No. 05-13-00929-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG-MIERS.

Appellant Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. sued appellee Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. alleging claims for breach of contract and fraud. Maxim counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment that the parties’ contract never commenced. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Maxim. On appeal, Matheson argues that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Maxim. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

This is the second case involving a nitrogen gas pipeline that runs from Mathe-son’s facility to a semi-conductor facility located in Irving, Texas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Fina Supply, Inc. v. Abilene National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.A. LANIER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. AMERICAN LANDMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC f/k/a ROBBINS ELECTRA MANAGEMENT, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022
  2. in Re: Enterprise Crude Oil, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API