Legal Opinion
United States v. Mahler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1960No. Cr. 156-341PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss the first and third counts of the indictment on the ground that prosecution is time barred under the applicable statute of limitations. 1
The first count charges the defendant Mahler with willful tax evasion with respect to his and his wife’s 1951 return. 2 The codefendants are charged with aiding and abetting.
The third count, which charges a conspiracy by the defendant and his two codefendants to violate 26 U.S.C. § 145 (b), alleges, as one of the overt acts, the filing of the 1951 return, the subject of the first count.
The return in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. StefusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Wiggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Joe B. Butler, David R. Holmes, Donnie WaitesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Thomas Andrew Guerro, Angelo Michael Marino, Lucien Joseph Provost, and Anthony Joseph BottiglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. MatisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- United States v. ShermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- United States v. HorwitzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.