John Doe v. Univ. of St. Thomas
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tunheim, Chief Judge
Plaintiff John Doe ("Doe") brought this action against the University of St. Thomas ("UST"), a private university, stemming from UST's investigation of a sexual misconduct complaint made against him. Doe originally brought six causes of action; however, the Court dismissed five of them, and the only remaining cause of action is one based on negligence. UST now moves for summary judgment on the negligence claim. The Court finds that UST owed Doe a duty of reasonable care, but because UST did not breach its duty of care, the Court will grant the Motion.
BACKGROUND
I. UST'S SEXUAL MISCONDUCT POLICY
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe 1 v. Independent School District 31District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Doe 7 v. Southeast Missouri State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Unknown Party v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021