Legal Opinion
Royster v. McCoy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1956No. 36876PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Justice.
Betty Jean Royster, hereinafter called claimant, filed her claim for compensation under the Death Benefit Provision, 85 O.S. 1951 § 1 et seq., stating that her husband, Vol Dale Royster, hereinafter called deceased, sustained an accidental injury resulting in death on December 12, 1953. The trial commissioner entered an award for the total amount, $13,500 and, on appeal to the Commission en banc, the award was vacated.
This proceeding was brought by claimant to review the order denying the award.
•The deceased was employed by T. G. McCoy,. doing business as McCoy Rent-A-Trailer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Louie v. Bamboo GardensIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Dillon v. DillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Darco Transportation v. DulenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Mullins v. TankslearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Matter of Death of MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.