Legal Opinion

Butler & Herman Co. v. Meth

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 8, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District. The Butler & Herman Company brought summary proceedings to •dispossess Jacob Meth, a tenant. Possession was awarded to plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The landlord has obtained a final order in its favor in summary proceedings dispossessing the tenant. On June 18, 1906, Samuel, Isaac, and Charles Bernstein leased to the appellant the premises Nos. 322-334 East 101st street, New York City, for the term of three years, commencing on July 15, 1906.- On June 15, 1909, the parties to the original lease entered into an extension agreement, whereby ..the term of the original lease was extended for one year from July 15,'*1909. The landlord obtained possession of the premises by deed dated July 19, 1909, and delivered August 2, 1909, and recorded August…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gates v. NortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. Krim Realty Corp. v. VarveriAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. Manzo v. Patch Publishing Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Fallek v. Central Desk Safe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Basiliko Inv. Corp. v. United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API