Legal Opinion

DIV. OF LAB. LAW ENFORCEMENT v. Mayfair Mkts.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1951No. 162588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

102 Cal.App.2d 943 (1951)

227 P.2d 463

DIVISION OF LABOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Appellant,

v.

MAYFAIR MARKETS (a Corporation), Respondent.

Docket No. 162588.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Diego.

February 14, 1951.

Pauline Nightingale, Edward M. Belasco and Leon H. Berger for Appellant.

Mitchell, Johnson & Bates and Elbert J. Sheffield for Respondent.

GLEN, J.

Plaintiff brought this action on behalf of its assignor for one week's vacation pay alleged to be due its assignor from defendant employer. This appeal is on the judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Roberts v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Roberts v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Briggs v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. CALIFORNIA STATE AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API